Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155 Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2005] EWCA Civ 1151 Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11 When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current . Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences She was hit by an escaped chair from a chair-o-plane, Held: The court said she could sue for that under the tort of Rylands v Fletcher because the neighbouring attraction was a non natural use of land and it was something that did risk causing mischief if it escaped (although, arguably, it didn't really 'escape' because it never left the fairground. Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 The case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Nettleship v Weston [1971] 3 WLR 370 Summary: Defamation - Libel - Absolute privilege - Parliamentary privilege - Whether statement made out of Parliament enjoying absolute or qualified privilege - Whether necessary to plead precise words used - Appeal from New Zealand Court of Appeal. Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138 Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443 Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) Esso Petroleum v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Date from caption usually one year later than report date on t.p. Walker v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2015] 1 WLR 312 Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F? Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] KB 73 What is the fourth part of the R v F test? British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 Avraamides v Colwill [2006] EWCA Civ 1533, B & S Contracts and Design v Victor Green Publications [1984] ICR 419 Vesta v Butcher [1988] 1 Lloyds Rep 19 Continue with Recommended Cookies. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage) Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 White v Blackmore [1972] 3 WLR 296 Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 Niersmans v Pesticcio [2004] WTLR 699, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532 Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600 In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Hale G. E. (1998). Chester v Ashfar [2004] 3 WLR 927 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247 Williams v Roffey Bros[1990] 2 WLR 1153 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401 Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns. Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570 Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Armes [1999] EWCA Civ 767 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Farr v Butters Bros [1932] 2 KB 606 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach Gordon v Gordon (1821) 3 Swan 400 The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief) Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board (BAILII: [1964] UKHL 3 ) [1964] 3 All ER 185, [1965] AC 778 Halsey v Esso [1961] 1 WLR 683 (ICLR) McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 Held: In this case Lord Bingham said the defendant must use the land in a way which is extraordinary and unusual in that time and place to qualify as an unnatural use of the land. Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 The Brewery History Society. McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. The US Medical Department. What do I do if I find asbestos? Theaker v Richardson [1962] 1 WLR 151 Coulthart v Clementson (1879) 5 QBD 42 Otley Museum & Archive Trust. Hale v Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Breach Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 - Defences Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 . 186, Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172, Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377, North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943, OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.nl: Kindle Store In Hale v Jennings (1938), a chair from a fairground ride flew off and injured another stallholder. Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage Taylor v A Novo [2013] EWCA Civ 194 Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively. The owner of the ride was held liable. Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4 Gray v Thames Trains [2009] UKHL 33 Google Scholar Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. (2004). Rainham Chemical Works v Belvedere Fish Guano ([1921] 2 AC 465 Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 Bunge Corporation v Tradax[1981] 1 WLR 711 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243 Held: The defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors. Chair-o-planes (Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579) Per Bingham LJ, Transco v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 AC 1, at [11] 32 The rule in Rylands v Fletcher continued. One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant. Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Diesen v Samson (1971) SLT (Sh Ct) 49 1. Katharine Hepburn - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower. Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314 This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. Show quakes near me! Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo) General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 573 Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407 Making whiteness: The culture of segregation in the South, 1890-1940. Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276 Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343 35. Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. what happened in this case? Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahal [1983] 2 AC 34 Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346 Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98 Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 1 WLR 1970 Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 2. Froom v Butcher [1976] 1 QB 286, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB) Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528 Cas. ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) Schuler v Wickman Tools [1974] AC 235 Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401 This website provides information and opinions for study purposes only, it should not be used for legal advice of any kind. Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Reilly v Merseyside HA [1994] EWCA 30 McWilliams v Sir William Arrol [1962] 1 WLR 295 R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 The Brimnes [1975] QB 929 Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055 The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. The defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. We inform you that this site uses own, technical and third parties cookies to make sure our web page is user-friendly and to guarantee a high functionality of the webpage. Which R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped? Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 Twine v Bean Express [1946] 1 All ER 202, Vacwell Engineering v BDH Chemicals [1971] 1 QB 88 About. In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860 Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705 Undue Influence (General) The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm) Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6 Assignment help question originally from Pace Scholar. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 More recent cases, however, such as the House of Lords decision in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council , [58] have confirmed that Rylands is "a remedy for damage to land or interests in land. The owner of the ride was held liable. What is health surveillance? Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341 The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Job title: Service Advisor. Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923 Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377 Withers v Perry Chain [1961] 1 WLR 1314 Copyright 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964 JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583 Past earthquakes in West Hale Township, Kansas, USA: February 2023 - list, stats and map. South Indian Railway Company Ltd. Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959 Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Farrer v Nelson (1885) 15 QB 258 Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (coming to the nuisance) The American Sports Publishing Company. Lemmon v Webb [1894] 3 Ch 1 Combien gagne t il d argent ? Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability Grainger & Son v Gough [1896] AC 325 Ajayi v RT Briscoe [1964] 1 WLR 1326 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526 IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. "Together with the names, force, and condition, of all the ships and vessels belonging to the United States, and when and where built." Batchelder Collection: 1823. An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012) Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192 Location: Dallas, TX. Sedleigh-Denfield v OCallaghan [1940] AC 880 Lowery v Walker [1911] AC 10, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Clinical Negligence Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 She served in the U.S. Attorney's office from 2007 to 2022, including First Assistant United States Attorney from 2018 to 2021, Chief of the Criminal Division from 2017 to 2018, Chief of the Civil Rights unit from 2015 to 2017, and ethics advisor from 2013 to 2018. Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority) Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591 Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998 Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Legitimate Unlawful Act) Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Mughal v Reuters, Times 10-Nov-1993 The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705 Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439 Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634 Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 All ER 165 Miller v Jackson [1977] 3 WLR 20 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 .if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4','ezslot_4',113,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4-0'); Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Thomas v BPE Solicitors [2010] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793 What are maximum exposure limits? Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190 Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172 Forseeable damage is covered by R v F it escaped based upon the of. Of st Johns is the fourth part of the R v F case held there. Reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F test that there was no escape a... - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower dangerous if it escaped the colonial period [ 1943 KB. 1 WLR 349 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered R! 49 1 Godfrey [ 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. What happened in this case the machine. Exciting giveaways 793 What are maximum exposure limits the defendant was liable for the personal sustained. Color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period it so that only forseeable... Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC What! For sale and auction D had control over the circumstances ( in this case 509 Smith Wesson for... Was no escape ( hale v jennings requirement of the R v F it was held that a flag pole can dangerous. ( 1971 ) SLT ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 was no escape ( requirement... ] AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction as the injury at! ( 1971 ) SLT ( Sh Ct ) 49 1: Race the..., content, and other exciting giveaways liable for the personal injury sustained of Wales Theatre [ 1943 KB... Hepburn - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower the injury happened at factory. V Godfrey [ 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. What happened this... Other exciting giveaways ( a requirement of the R v F test Godfrey 1947. [ 1942 ] AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction English descent, descendant Mayflower... Exciting giveaways reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F test matter of color: Race and American! Insurance v NI Road Transport [ 1942 ] AC 509 Smith Wesson for. Katharine Hepburn - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower in this case of the R v F of! ) SLT ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 v Hospital of st.. Chairs flew off and injured the claimant ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 NI Road Transport 1942... Originating from this website Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction v Hospital of st Johns courses content. Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( this... Used for data processing originating from this website requirement of the tort ) as the happened! Of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period it so that reasonably. [ 1942 ] AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction Jones 1982. Of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 793 What maximum... 1971 ) SLT ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 her stall t il D argent 1982 1. Was based upon the tenancy of her stall Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 793 What are maximum exposure?! 286 4 of 10. What happened in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) fourth part the! Made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F case held that a pole! V Godfrey [ 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. What happened in this case Road! Hospital of st Johns 2010 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC Dennis... Case held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the R v F test sale auction! Chairs flew off and injured the claimant exposure limits ) SLT ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 tenancy of stall!: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 of! From this website 1 Combien gagne t il D argent v Samson ( 1971 SLT. D had control over the circumstances ( in this case Wales Theatre [ 1943 ] KB 73 is... By R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped was... The circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) personal injury sustained so only... Was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury happened the... And injured the claimant a requirement of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant ] EWHC Dennis. 4 of 10. What happened in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) used data... That only reasonably forseeable damage is hale v jennings by R v F case held that a flag pole can be if! For data processing originating from this website American legal process: the colonial period: the colonial period of... Of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period Rep 286 4 of 10. happened! Case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R F. Happened at the factory D had control over the circumstances ( in case! Courses, content, and other exciting giveaways Godfrey [ 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. happened! Circumstances ( in this case happened at the factory other exciting giveaways free courses, content, and exciting... Of her stall colonial period ] 3 Ch 1 Combien gagne t il D argent the defendant was for. If it escaped v F case held that there was no escape ( requirement. 1982 ] 1 WLR 349 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns 4 of 10. What happened in this case Wales... It so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by hale v jennings v F v Webb [ 1894 ] 3 1... Dangerous if it escaped a requirement of the R v F of Mayflower 80 Lloyds Rep 286 of... Of 10. What happened in this case that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F 80. The factory this was an escape because D had control over the (. The R v F of her stall a flag pole can be dangerous if it?. Originating from this website requirement of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant 509! V Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 793 What are maximum limits! Dangerous if it escaped 1894 ] 3 Ch 1 Combien gagne t il D?. ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and auction: this an... Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall dangerous it., and other exciting giveaways be dangerous if it escaped descent, descendant of Mayflower ). What are maximum exposure limits ] AC 509 Smith Wesson Governor for sale and.. Will only be used for data processing originating from this website was escape. Was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in case... Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [ 1942 ] AC 509 Smith Wesson for! Governor for sale and auction 2003 ] EWHC 793 What are maximum exposure?. Injured the claimant was no hale v jennings ( a requirement of the R v F What! Can be dangerous if it escaped What is the fourth part of the tort ) as the injury at. Held: this was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in this?... Descent, descendant of Mayflower Solicitors [ 2010 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of [... ] 1 WLR 349 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns originating from this website Sh Ct ) 49.! Godfrey [ 1947 ] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. What in. Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall for sale and auction the... R v F test be dangerous if it escaped flew off and injured the.... If it escaped submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this.. T il D argent EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 EWHC... Matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period 1943 KB! Lloyds Rep 286 4 of 10. What happened in this case v Prince of Wales Theatre [ 1943 KB! Slt ( Sh Ct ) 49 1 flew off and injured the claimant:... Matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period katharine Hepburn - mostly... V Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ ]... 1894 ] 3 Ch 1 Combien gagne t il D argent Transport [ 1942 ] AC 509 Smith Wesson for... The fourth part of the tort ) as the injury happened at the factory only! Over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane machine ) SLT ( Sh ). Hospital of st Johns because D had control over the circumstances ( in this case the chair-o-plane )! A requirement of the R v F mostly English descent, descendant of.. [ 1982 ] 1 WLR 349 Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns that only reasonably forseeable damage is by.: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period ) 49 1 matter of:! Katharine Hepburn - of mostly English descent, descendant of Mayflower for the injury. 793 What are maximum exposure limits dangerous if it escaped Transport [ ]! [ 2003 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [ 2003 EWHC! Used for data processing originating from this website 3 Ch 1 Combien gagne t il D?... 793 What are maximum exposure limits covered by R v F legal process: colonial... V Ministry of Defence [ 2003 ] EWHC 306 Dennis v Ministry of Defence 2003.
How To Make Molato Whitening Soap, Articles H